1. Notes: 109720 / 7 hours ago  from acornfarm (originally from zamutikusokmnekiria)
    xv7:

this is like the old early 2000 photos couples used to take in the club just a lizard version

Is the little spoon lizard pregnant?

    xv7:

    this is like the old early 2000 photos couples used to take in the club just a lizard version

    Is the little spoon lizard pregnant?

    (Source: zamutikusokmnekiria)

     
  2. Notes: 10775 / 7 hours ago  from pogpung (originally from thegbox)
    rightwingtoday:

thegbox:

No, no and no. REBLOG this please, this shouldn’t be allowed and we need to spread the word to everybody about this injustice!
The actual news article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2726219/Yasmin-Thomas-victim-disgusted-walked-free.html

It’s time for all countries to stand up and say no more special treatment based on gender, race or sexual orientation.

I’d think attractiveness is a bigger factor than gender, but yeah, nto having face-glassing psychopaths arbitrarily pardoned by the “justice” system would be nice.

    rightwingtoday:

    thegbox:

    No, no and no. REBLOG this please, this shouldn’t be allowed and we need to spread the word to everybody about this injustice!

    The actual news article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2726219/Yasmin-Thomas-victim-disgusted-walked-free.html

    It’s time for all countries to stand up and say no more special treatment based on gender, race or sexual orientation.

    I’d think attractiveness is a bigger factor than gender, but yeah, nto having face-glassing psychopaths arbitrarily pardoned by the “justice” system would be nice.

     
  3. Notes: 12550 / 7 hours ago  from pogpung (originally from jolly-reaper)

    jolly-reaper:

    what am I doing

  4. Notes: 165 / 7 hours ago  from humblegrandeur (originally from superamiuniverse)

    superamiuniverse:

    RAT CYBORRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

    I FOUGHT THOUGH THE CAAAATSSSS

    YOU HARVEST YOUR RAAAATTTSSSS

    BUT MAYBE WERE BOTH THE SAAAAMMMEEEEEE

    MY KIND HAS BEEN CHURNED

    FOR ANSWERS YOUR EARNED

    BUT NOBODY IS TO BLLAAAAMMEEEE

    YET STARING ACROSS THIS BARREN WASTED LAND

    NEW LIFE WILL BE BORN BENEATH THE BLOOD STAINED SAAAAAND

    This is literally the most terrifying thing I’ve ever seen. Science has now taken the brain of a living being capable of consciousness and wired it to a machine. Several times.
    THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF EXISTENTIAL TERROR.

    We are SO CLOSE to Metal Gear Rising being real, and I’m referring to the bad parts.

  5. Notes: 151121 / 7 hours ago  from nerdqueen42 (originally from nosuchthingasfiction)

    mistress-laufeyson:

    ramon-salamander:

    witchlingfumbles:

    GUISE

    GUISE

    IF YOU HIT “X+C” IT SHUTS OFF EVERY GIF ON YOUR DASH

    EVERY SINGLE ONE TURNS TO A LITTLE GREY BOX WITH A LOCK

    GUISE

    TUMBLR HAS MADE ITSELF SAFE FOR EPILEPTICS

    PASS IT ON

    I BRING FORTH THIS KNOWLEDGE TO ANY FELLOW TUMBLRITES/SEIZURE-PRONE PEOPLE THAT MAY FOLLOW ME

    KINDLY THANK THE OP FOR THIS KNOWLEDGE

    I AM A HUMBLE MESSENGER

    oh i thought this would be useful for when your parents walk by but ok

    I know it’s corny but I habitually reblog anything that might actually help someone. Like, medically.

    (Source: nosuchthingasfiction)

  6. Notes: 142038 / 7 hours ago  from pogpung (originally from ladyinterior)

    giancarlovolpe:

    ladyinterior:

    Magnificent Trees Around the World

    If you ever work with me you’ll know how much I hate lollipop-shaped-for-shorthand-trees. 

  7. Notes: 15524 / 7 hours ago  from humblegrandeur (originally from pudding09)

    humblegrandeur:

    pudding09:

    *能年玲奈*

    本日、能年玲奈主演映画『海月姫』の劇中写真が解禁となりました!!

    お楽しみに☆

    映画『ホットロード』公開中!!

    Live action?!?

    Is this where Daria went?

    (Source: twitter.com)

  8. Notes: 21176 / 7 hours ago  from onionsuu (originally from limey404)
    limey404:

i needed dipper feeding sad mabel infinite nachos on my blog

    limey404:

    i needed dipper feeding sad mabel infinite nachos on my blog

     
  9. Notes: 1898 / 7 hours ago  from onionsuu (originally from sixpenceee)
    alohasophh:

sixpenceee:

In high school I took a lot of social science classes. It was interesting, but all the politics and the roaring debates in classroom was a major turn off. Don’t get me wrong. I recognize it’s important. But to me, it was a whirling pool of anger and resentment.
That’s not the major reason I chose to be a science major, but it’s a contributing factor. I thought science was all factual information. People in lab coats striving to better understand our world. To me that was beautiful and I wanted to be a part of it. Burning people at stake for a different viewpoint was centuries ago… right? 
Wrong. Science is just as susceptible to that “whirlpool of anger and resentment” as anything else. Even if something has been proven with impeccable data and results, it does not guarantee acceptance with open arms.
Take Dr.Bruce Lipton for example. We now take epigenetics seriously. But in the 1990’s when the topic was first introduced, scientists blew up into hysterics at the thought of the concept. This is why Dr.Lipton left the academia for good in 1992, because although his experiments supported his views, he felt his message was falling onto deaf ears.
An interesting book, I’m reading called The Mind (edited by John Brockman) also highlights an example. When Darwin came back from his voyage, he displayed his Galapagos finches and reptiles, the crucial evidence of evolution. John Gould who was a great ornithologist at the time and knew a lot about birds, corrected some of Darwin’s information and gave him more crucial information in support of evolution. 
But Gould himself still remained a creationist and didn’t stand for evolution. As the book says "the man who knew more saw less and the man who knew less saw more"
I learned that great things take time. Facts and statistics don’t persuade people. Some are forever imprisoned by their own beliefs.
Here is a great article on how some people respond to scientific evidence by twisting information to fit their preexisting views (LINK)
Ofcourse science is a ever changing field and I’m sure by the time I’m 40, science textbooks will be revised and edited many times over. But many new concepts are heavily ridiculed and then gradually accepted generations later. 
"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."
-Max Planck

I aspire to be you.

I’ll never forget that quote from a gifset with Bill Nye."What would make you change your mind?"Creationist: Nothing.Bill: Evidence.

    alohasophh:

    sixpenceee:

    In high school I took a lot of social science classes. It was interesting, but all the politics and the roaring debates in classroom was a major turn off. Don’t get me wrong. I recognize it’s important. But to me, it was a whirling pool of anger and resentment.

    That’s not the major reason I chose to be a science major, but it’s a contributing factor. I thought science was all factual information. People in lab coats striving to better understand our world. To me that was beautiful and I wanted to be a part of it. Burning people at stake for a different viewpoint was centuries ago… right? 

    Wrong. Science is just as susceptible to that “whirlpool of anger and resentment” as anything else. Even if something has been proven with impeccable data and results, it does not guarantee acceptance with open arms.

    Take Dr.Bruce Lipton for example. We now take epigenetics seriously. But in the 1990’s when the topic was first introduced, scientists blew up into hysterics at the thought of the concept. This is why Dr.Lipton left the academia for good in 1992, because although his experiments supported his views, he felt his message was falling onto deaf ears.

    An interesting book, I’m reading called The Mind (edited by John Brockman) also highlights an example. When Darwin came back from his voyage, he displayed his Galapagos finches and reptiles, the crucial evidence of evolution. John Gould who was a great ornithologist at the time and knew a lot about birds, corrected some of Darwin’s information and gave him more crucial information in support of evolution. 

    But Gould himself still remained a creationist and didn’t stand for evolution. As the book says "the man who knew more saw less and the man who knew less saw more"

    I learned that great things take time. Facts and statistics don’t persuade people. Some are forever imprisoned by their own beliefs.

    Here is a great article on how some people respond to scientific evidence by twisting information to fit their preexisting views (LINK)

    Ofcourse science is a ever changing field and I’m sure by the time I’m 40, science textbooks will be revised and edited many times over. But many new concepts are heavily ridiculed and then gradually accepted generations later. 

    "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."

    -Max Planck

    I aspire to be you.

    I’ll never forget that quote from a gifset with Bill Nye.
    "What would make you change your mind?"
    Creationist: Nothing.
    Bill: Evidence.

     
  10. Notes: 2602 / 7 hours ago  from onionsuu (originally from unexplained-events)

    unexplained-events:

    Mine Kafon by Massoud Hassani

    Hassani, a product designer from Afganistan, build (by hand) a wind-powered device that trips land mines as it rolls across the ground. It is made using bamboo and biodegradable products.

    Many of these mines are active and near populated areas in countries like Afganistan and are hard to remove. The UN says that one mine clearance specialist is killed, and two injured, for every 5,000 mines cleared.

    Hassani’s cheap and easy to make method has been achieving great results.

    SOURCE

    Wait, nobody before this man thought “Just roll a Katamari through the minefields?”

  11. Notes: 334440 / 7 hours ago  from humblegrandeur (originally from darning-socks)

    squeaky-fangirl:

    darning-socks:

    ((The ability to appreciate and evaluate human aesthetic is not determined by your sexuality))

    THANK YOU

    I like how hard this concept is.

    No, I’ll point out hot guys all the time. If I could think of one off the cuff, I’d name him, but I wouldn’t jam any part of my body inside or around one.

avatar_128
 
 
A place for learning so awesome it will probably implode your brain.
Now with inquiry receptacle!
 
 

Following

mokamonnomocatonionsuuonisuupbison2winquotenerdqueen42acornfarmhumblegrandeurpogpungnipuniakimiyabeeandpuppycattextsfromsuperheroesnuryfurysakimichanrebeccasugarsarahseeandersenitscarororokyaptanvgpersonnamfaceradiomarupyayayajendo-the-noponbrazilianbubblebutts4-panel-lifegarfieldminusgarfieldfunrinpacaluckyacorncosplayappoggiaturaemmychanamitaiurctgenevieve-ftinconvenienttrixiecosmickonettmadziapsummonerscodeseianirennyskywalkerjunwoolaskpalette-swapanimalsbeingdicksshiyunbuggletzilenstriacomics365onedayfourthejohnsunatazillanenna-art-blobaskgamerponies2snacksjephjacquesasksurpriseonionlikekirinfluffkatyuskamoonfoxwonnysoupmynareshrapnelsoupfuckyeahbabyanimalsomar-dogandoriruaskhotbloodedpinkiehighschool-cadancepkmn-fusionleadlesanimalswithstuffedanimalstaeshidiaryasktheportalradiotehjadehdrawsrosaliedrinksthingsdiscorderlyconductwhywouldyoudothatspidermanschadenfreezersarachnidsgrip-agprinpanxamag-homestuckfwddd12085askthepiesistersdogestreetjournalfyeahpokeparentsbadlyrecreatedanimatedfilmframesnotchask-the-mane-sixthelimburgerbabydaisuke-aratadumbdeviantartclairegamethecomingthingonehundredfortycharactersorlesswelcometothejamask-doctorcolgatenekreskwayayayaaleaguetriviafyeahwriterleopardsnoopy409vanillabuttsflying-cantaloupe
 

Tumblr